|
|
||
|
MaHKU is the one-year Master programme of the Utrecht Graduate School of Visual Art and Design (HKU). MaHKU comprises five disciplines, i.e. Editorial Design, Fashion Design, Fine Art, Interior Design, and Public Space Design. The programme offers an MA curriculum both discipline-specific and interdisciplinary entailing a mixture of provocative seminars and workshops.
As a MaHKU student, you will reflect on your specific discipline, participate in interdisciplinary debates, and embark on the development of innovative insights for your own discipline and its professionals. In other words, you will be invited to participate in a topical theoretical discourse. |
For the current course programmes check:
Fine Art Agenda Editorial Design Agenda Fashion Communication Agenda Interior design Agenda Public Space Agenda |
|
Artistic research
|
Kathrin Hero
Books and digitization
The book’s place – a very old debate Where is the book’s place in today’s hybrid information production? In a time when the book as a medium has repeatedly been declared dead my position as a book lover used to be a defensive one. I sought valuable and preferably measurable arguments that could explain the so called ‘charm’, ‘magic’ and ‘comfort’ of the traditional codex book, as mentioned by many bibliophiles and book collectors. Read more |
Pedro Kok
The Room of Architectural Representation
It may be redundant to say that a certain field of production is at crossroads in contemporary life, particularly those related to artistic output. All fields are subject to ongoing transformations, their relevance and pertinence questioned constantly. I went into the 2010 Venice Biennale with a certain question: with widespread access to architectural imagery, is architect ural photography still relevant today within the exhibition space? Read more |







The book’s place – a very old debate
It may be redundant to say that a certain field of production is at crossroads in contemporary life, particularly those related to artistic output. All fields are subject to ongoing transformations, their relevance and pertinence questioned constantly. I went into the 2010 Venice Biennale with a certain question: with widespread access to architectural imagery, is architect ural photography still relevant today within the exhibition space? 


